Kingsman: The Secret Service was a delightful surprise in
2015. Coming into it, I didn’t expect it
to be that so much fun with its over-the-top take on the old-school gentleman spy
genre as established by James Bond.
Hence, I was greatly looking forward to its sequel, Kingsman: The Golden Circle. Unfortunately, it’s not nearly as fresh and
enjoyable. Bummer.
Kingsman: The Golden Circle picks up about a year after the events
of the first movie. Eggsy (Taron
Egerton) is now carrying the “Galahad” codename, and is now in a relationship
with the Swedish Crown Princess Tilde (Hanna Alström). While he’s dining with the princess and her
parents, the criminal organization called “The Golden Circle”, led by Poppy
Adams, sends out missiles to destroy every Kingsman establishment, annihilating
all agents, except for Eggsy and Merlin (Mark Strong). Without any resources, the two proceed to seek
the aid of Statesman, the Kingsman’s counterpart in America, in order to stop
Poppy and save the millions around the world that she infected with a deadly
toxin and held hostage. But before they
can deal with it, they first make a shocking discovery: the original Galahad,
Harry Hart (Colin Firth), is alive!
The Golden Circle still has a lot of fun things going for it. The humor and quirkiness are still
strong. The visuals are extremely appealing
and stylish, both in cinematography aesthetics and action sequences. And everyone in the cast – augmented by newcomers Pedro Pascal, Halle Berry, Channing Tatum, and Jeff Bridges, who are playing Statesman agents – delivered great
performances.
The script, however, isn’t
as smart and engaging as that of the first movie. It’s bogged down by several subplots, which
makes the narrative a tad boring at times.
In addition to that, this film has a noticeable Gazelle-void; Poppy is
an okay antagonist, but not striking at all, and as the cliché goes, “The story
is only as strong as its antagonist.”
Just like in the first one, my
favorite thing about this movie is Colin Firth.
He really has the features of a perfect gentleman spy. Unfortunately, though he had his moments, I felt
he was underused here. Actually, in my review of the first movie, the only thing I thought would improve it is making Harry
Hart the central character. That notion
is also my stand with this movie. However,
since that is something impossible at this point, I would have been fine if, at
the very least, he had the same amount of significant presence to the plot as
he had in the first movie. But that won’t
be the case. Also, this movie has nothing
comparable to the spectacular “church shootout” scene.
Bummer.
Another thing I didn’t like about
this movie is that the trailers already showed the film’s most exciting moments
and most important story points, in parts or in full. We knew that Colin Firth is returning in this
film, but a gratifying sense of surprise would have been provided if he wasn’t
shown in the trailers and promo photos at all. This is
also true with giving out the detail of the Kingsman being wiped out; this could
have been a real shocker. And,
seriously, I would have loved the action scenes and gadgets more if I hadn’t been aware of any details regarding them – because, again, the trailers already showed their
“money shots.”
Lastly, on a side note, Elton
John playing a role in this movie doesn’t work for me. It’s not because I don’t like the creep
(though I like his musical contribution to the Lion King and The Road to El
Dorado). I actually did laugh on some
of the gags centered on him. But there’s
something self-indulgent and dumb about his participation that doesn’t fit with
the overall feel of the movie.
In the end, Kingsman: The Golden Circle is a disappointment. Not that it’s bad. Again, it’s still pretty fun. But because of the highs set by the first
film, I was expecting this movie to reach the same. Which it didn’t. Bummer.
No comments:
Post a Comment