When Game of Thrones was already six seasons in, I wasn’t watching it
yet. Still, considering it’s arguably
the biggest TV show this decade, it was impossible not to get wind of what was
going on with it through the years. Game of Thrones was everywhere in the
Internet. Thus, even though I wasn’t
watching it, I became familiar of its major characters and biggest happenings.
But while its sixth season was
ongoing, someone gave me A Game of
Thrones – the first novel in A Song
of Ice and Fire, the fantasy book series on which the show was based from –
as a birthday present. Of course, I had
to read it. And since I already got and
read the first book, I was compelled to buy and read the rest of the ASoIaF series. And since I was already reading the book
series, I just had to start watching the show as well. That’s just how compulsive completionist
geekery works.
So, I did jump into it. And I had the unique experience of experiencing
this franchise for the first time through reading A Song of Ice and Fire (the five available novels so far) and watching
Game of Throne (the six seasons at
that point) side by side, shifting between chapters and episodes. A couple of weeks later, I got caught up with
where the story and fandom were at that point.
Because I got to basically
experience the books and show simultaneously, I felt that I got to closely
compare them. And the conclusion I
arrived at? The show was superior – and
I still think so up to now, until George R.R. Martin proves otherwise with The Winds of Winter and A Dream of Spring (when he gets around
to finishing them, whenever that will be).
Game of Thrones didn’t always
get it right (it definitely did a discredit to Loras Tyrell), but most of the
time, it did a brilliant job in picking what
parts from the books were worth adapting and then in realizing these on screen magnificently. During the junction where the books and the
show were heading toward their separate ways with the plot, it seemed to me
that the latter had the more intriguing vision and tighter storytelling as a
whole. On the other hand, I honestly
thought A Feast for Crows and A Dance with Dragons were messily convoluted
at parts, and they made me feel that the ASoIaF
series was starting to fall a little bit under the weight of all the
complexities it had set for itself.
Unfortunately, after seven great
seasons, Game of Thrones couldn’t
deliver an emphatic finale. Very few
fans were satisfied with it. The eighth
and final season really felt off when compared to the rest of the series. Now, the first two episodes were actually
pretty good. The third one had the stupidest battle plan ever, but it was still a mostly okay episode. However, the cracks were showing at that time. And then, everything just went downhill from
there. The last three episodes were
shockingly badly-written.
Season 8 definitely suffered from
being a shortened one. It felt rushed,
especially those final four episodes. It
felt like the narrative was cramming a lot of things into itself, while at the
same time, it was progressing at a rapid pace in which nothing was marinating and
making sense properly. Now, the seventh
season also had a shortened season.
However, although it was uncharacteristically fast-paced, it didn’t feel
rushed in the same sense. It just felt,
well, uncharacteristically fast-paced. A
second viewing may expose the flaws in the seventh season’s writing, but at that
time, they weren’t apparent – or, if they were, they weren’t worth making a big
deal out of – since the burden of giving the show a proper resolution didn’t
hang on its head.
Nevertheless, I think Game of Thrones would have had a better
tail end if it had more episodes for both seasons 7 and 8. That way, the storylines would have had more
room to gel and be fleshed out thoroughly, and thus, the controversial choices that
were made down the stretch would have been sold much better to the audience.
Of course, I had some preferences
with how things should have ended. But I
have no problem with most of the decisions done on the story. The problem, really, was on the execution,
which was sloppy, unearned, and unappealing.
It was as if things happened just because. I have no problem with Daenerys becoming
unhinged and murderous, but the problem lies on the unpersuasive execution
leading toward it.
As a result of poor execution, which
stemmed from the combination of bad writing and the lack of adequate number of episodes
to work with, many of the character arcs and key events in season 8 – Jaime
returning to Cersei; Tyrion and Varys, two of the smartest and most cunning
characters in the show, mysteriously forgetting how to be smart and cunning; Bran
becoming king; etc. – felt utterly BS.
Especially Bran becoming king. It was
so random. There was no sensible build
up to it whatsoever. Surely, nobody was
satisfied with Bran becoming king. In
addition, Tyrion arguing that Bran was the best choice for king because he had
the “best story” was dumb. What does
that even mean? Sure, Bran is nigh
omniscient, and thus, with every relevant information available to him when
making a decision, he can potentially bring about the best outcome for the
realm at all times. On the other hand,
he also seemingly lacks empathy. Thus,
the “best outcome” to him may be what’s efficient and practical, and as a
result, his decisions will be solely reliant on that cold outlook, and will
have no room for considerations based on compassion or charity. He’s basically Dr. Manhattan. And such character becoming a ruler is bad
news. Bran is much better off as an
adviser to a monarch, instead of the monarch whose words are absolute on the
land.
Another symptom of the bad
writing was the lingering sense that several plot threads were not tied neatly. Not only that, but there were definitely plot
points that were forgotten about. It
was, like, after years of building up the narrative in a way that progressively
increased the engrossment and anticipation of the audience as a result, the
writers had no idea how to wrap it all up properly – as if the story became too
big for them to handle. Thus, they
failed to integrate into the final season appropriate payoffs for the
intriguing plot elements they introduced in the past. For example, in one of the show’s greatest twists,
it was revealed in season 6 that Bran can not only see the past, but also
affect it. Surely, such game-changing
introduction would play a major part in the future of the story. But, nah.
Apparently, that was it. The only
thing that came out of it was Hodor’s origin.
(Heck, the writers didn’t even have the decency to finally tell Tyrion’s
anecdote about the jackass and the honeycomb he brought to a brothel at its
full.)
And what was the whole point of
resurrecting Jon Snow and then revealing that he was Aegon Targaryen? Did anything rewarding about his arc came out
from those big twists? I don’t think so. Now, I wasn’t really been a big Jon Snow
fan. In my opinion, among the main
characters, he had the least impressive arc and characterization. Still, he had been arguably front and center of
the narrative, so I wish the writers handled the character in a better manner. I wish his arc had had a fantastic resolution. I have no problem with him not ending up on
the Iron Throne, or with his exile Beyond the Wall – this was actually a
spot-on development for the character. Nevertheless,
I think it would have been better if it wasn’t the others who decided his fate,
but rather, he was the one who actively chose where he would end up.
Here’s my fantasy scenario for
Jon Snow or something similar to this: after getting locked up by the Unsullied
for killing Daenerys, he is soon busted out of his prison by Drogon – to the
Unsullied’s great astonishment.
Meanwhile, most of the Seven Kingdoms – due to the efforts of Sansa and Tyrion
(assuming he was able to work inside his cell or he managed to escape prior to
it), who reveal Jon’s true ancestry to everyone – rally behind Jon. With a superweapon (i.e. Drogon) and the
Seven Kingdoms on the side of Jon Snow, the Unsullied are left with no choice
but to sue for peace. The lords of the Seven
Kingdoms insist that Jon becomes king, but he firmly refuses. He proposes that the old ways be abolished,
and that the lords instead discuss among themselves and then choose a leader
who will serve for a specific period of time, and at the end of that period of
time, he can either continue being the leader or be replaced, depending on the
decision of the lords – essentially laying down the groundwork for the
democratic process in Westeros. Jon can
even agree to becoming that first leader, but only if his term won’t be
extended. Afterward – either after he
convinces the lords during that initial dialogue or after he served his term – he
then heads out to the far north, and retire there with Ghost and the free folk.
I was also disappointed with how
Tyrion Lannister, my most favorite character, was handled in the show’s last
leg. My most preferred scenario for this
character was for him to end up on the Iron Throne (which I still hope will
happen in the books). At the very least,
being arguably the smartest character in the show, the script should have given
him a moment or two where he thought out or planned something notably smart (convincing
everyone to make Bran king was the opposite of this) during these closing
episodes. Unfortunately, Tyrion came off
as unimpressive or a non-factor – or even dumb – in the final season.
Nevertheless, even though its
ending was a massive let-down, Game of
Thrones should still be remembered as a revolutionary TV series. It was unprecedented in so many levels. Nothing like it had ever come out of TV
before. In due course, many new TV
series that followed gave the impression that they were trying to be the next Game of Thrones.
Its impact was evident from the
immense, widespread popularity it got; it’s probably the biggest IP in the 21st
century next to the MCU. It is a pop
culture institution.
In fact, in a way, the
considerable frustration for the quality of its final season is simply a
testament to how tremendous the benchmark quality the show had set for itself. At its peak, the script, character development, and storytelling were
sublime. Moreover, even when the writing
became bad, the other technical aspects never did. Production value was constantly high, and –
other than the occasional Starbucks cup left on set – attention to detail was solid.
This TV series met the best of cinematic
standards most of the time. The
production design remained superb until the end. So did the cinematography and the acting – especially
this! Truly, this show had some of the
greatest performances I’ve ever seen on both big and small screen (most
especially from Peter Dinklage).
All things considered, Game of Thrones was an amazing show that
completely changed the TV landscape forever.
No comments:
Post a Comment