Just 22% approval rating among
critics in Rotten Tomatoes?!
Really? I seriously don’t get
it. I really think The Book of Henry is pretty good.
It has great performances all around, and the plot is novel,
unpredictable, and bold.
The movie tells the story of
Henry Carpenter (Jaeden Lieberher), an 11-year-old boy genius whose superior
intellect allows him to be deeply knowledgeable and excel in various things –
from making Rube Goldberg-esque machines to investing in the stock market. Moreover, he reflects the maturity and acumen
of someone beyond his years, serving as the protector of his younger brother
Peter (Jacob Tremblay) and the trusted adviser of his mother Susan (Naomi
Watts). When Henry discovers a
despicable thing happening with their next door neighbor, he leaps into action
– taking matters into his own hands when nobody dares to help.
Giving out more plot details could
potentially lessen the impact of its surprises, so I won’t. Let’s just say that, though it’s not free of
flaws – it definitely has parts I wish had been improved – I tremendously appreciate its originality and ambitions. I found the movie quite charming.
It does this considerable tonal
shift which transformed itself into something entirely different from what it
started from. This is probably what
turned most critics off, as it may come off messy and uneven. Now, though the movie truly has a stronger
first half than a second half, I nevertheless think that what director Colin
Trevorrow did in this movie totally works.
I may be just one of the few that
thinks there’s something special with The
Book of Henry. But it’s an opinion
that I can comfortably stand with.
Absolutely one of 2017’s must-watch
films.
No comments:
Post a Comment