Coming to this movie, I know that
it is strongly disliked by the critics.
But even without those bad reviews, right from the start, there were
already elements of its production that made me worry. No, casting Ben Affleck as Batman was not one
of them. The first red flag for me was the
title. I hated the annoyingly pretentious
use of “v” instead of “vs.” Furthermore, putting “Dawn of Justice” as subtitle suggested
that the script would heavily shoo-in elements that would set up the Justice League movie, potentially distracting
the focus on what the movie should essentially be: Batman and Superman
clashing. Second, the trailers seemed to
have revealed so much information about the plot already.
All in all, now that I’ve finally seen it, I find Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice convoluted, problematic, and
messy. My initial dislike for the implications
of the title and trailers are justified.
However, I don’t reflect the brutality of the critics’ negative
reception of it. I don’t think it’s that awful. It actually has terrific aspects as well.
First, let me discuss the
negatives. (By the way, there are going
to be SPOILERS in this review.)
The main problem of BvS (I will be abbreviating the movie as
such from now on) is that it wanted to be several things at once. It has some cool ideas that would have
made for great premises for at least three movies. But by packing them all in one movie, plot
points didn’t have enough room to gel. Several
factors were affected negatively. The
direction was incapable of juggling them all.
The editing and pacing were off.
The writing was unable to mash them up sensibly and cleanly in a single
narrative, but instead relied on dumb and lazy tying conveniences.
And it didn’t help itself by
having a gritty, “realistic” tone. By
being so, audience would tend to treat it seriously. Stupid stuff easily stand out, and aren’t easily
forgivable.
I was not all pleased by how future
DC movies were set up in BvS. It felt too forced. I wasn’t at all excited when the Flash,
Aquaman, and Cyborg made cameos. In
fact, I was somewhat irritated by how indolent and condescending the approach
was. This movie’s sloppy execution simply
proves that the Marvel approach of taking it slow in building a shared universe
is much more preferable, since it’s done much more organically and cleverly. This also further enforces the sentiment that
Warner Bros. are much more concerned in establishing several cash flow sources as
quickly as possible than doing something pleasingly creative with its DC movies
(seriously, the DC movie guys should learn from the DC TV guys, who are generally
doing a great job in building its shared universe, or rather, multiverse).
There are also several instances
in this movie wherein it “spoon-feeds” its audience. Comic fans and sharp viewers will easily catch
details, but in case they are missed, the movie would really go a mile to make
them more obvious – as if the filmmakers are afraid that the general moviegoers
would miss them. Example, whenever
something Justice League related
happens, heavy music cues in. Or that Lex
Luthor’s collected footages of metahumans – hence, how the cameos happened – are
conveniently logoed. But the thing that
made me really groan was the series of short flashbacks to remind audiences
that Bruce Wayne’s mother and Clark Kent’s mother share the same name.
Lastly, I hated Lois Lane, Lex
Luthor, and Doomsday. Even during Man of Steel, I never liked Amy Adams as
Lois Lane, but she was more dislikable in this movie, as if she’s just a compulsory but needless element in the story. I rolled my eyes and groaned when she had this awkward bathtub scene which was obviously only there for an Olay product placement. I hated Jesse
Eisenberg’s reinvention of Luthor – so inferior from the charismatic persona of
the comics and cartoons. (For the record, Smallville’s Erica Durance and Michael
Rosenbaum are my most favorite live-action portrayals of these characters). As for Doomsday, I hated how he looked. He was like an LOTR troll. Heck, his “birth”
was even visually similar to the Uruk-hai’s formation.
Now, for the positives…
Of course, a Hollywood movie about
iconic superheroes will always have awesome stuff to offer – especially one
with Batman, Superman, and Wonder Woman.
For starters, the mere fact that they are all together on the big screen was enough to send
a happy chill down my spine.
The action sequences are exciting,
and though there are times when the CGI appeared obvious and ugly, the visuals
are exhilarating in general.
Ben Affleck proved to be a fascinating
Bruce Wayne/Batman. As far as appearance – looking like the character –
is concerned, he’s now my most favorite live-action Batman. I won’t say that he’s the overall best
live-action Batman, but he’s definitely distinctive. I love almost every aspect of this Batman –
his demeanor, gadgetry, Alfred (played fantastically by Jeremy Irons) – that
I believe having a new standalone Batman movie would have been much better than
BvS.
My only problem about this version of Batman is that he definitely
killed a couple of people in this movie – a departure from the character’s quintessential
“no-killing” rule. But my frustration
for this was minimized by looking at this movie with an Elseworld perspective, just as I did with Man of Steel.
Gal Gadot as Wonder Woman was
also fantastic. Though her presence in
this movie has a tang of being a gratuitous shoo-in, she was a delight to
watch, and now I’m greatly looking forward to her upcoming standalone film.
The integration of “The Death of
Superman”, one of the most powerful comic book moments in history, in the plot was a bold move that I appreciated. But the emotional
effect would definitely have been more emphatic if it wasn’t implied by the
last shot that he’s still alive. Also,
it would have paid off more if it happened in a separate movie, since by then, he
and Batman would already have been established having a strong friendship, and
his death would have had a deeper impact on Batman and the audience.
I’ve always been a fan of Batman and Superman, thus, I wish their first live-action big
screen time together came in a much different circumstance. These two heroes deserve something better
than BvS. Unfortunately, they belong to DC Comics, who in turn
belongs to Warner Bros., a studio that doesn’t have the kind of vision, patience, or enthusiasm
to give justice to these heroes on film.
Thus, BvS turned out being not as
good as what we fans desired. Though it
has a couple of awesome aspects, it’s unsuccessful in organizing them
cohesively. Hence, the result is a
clutter of missed opportunities and wasted concepts. Nonetheless, it’s not entirely loathsome – absolutely disappointing, but not at all loathsome. It still has facets of enjoyment.
No comments:
Post a Comment