Annihilation is a science fiction horror film written and directed
by Alex Garland. Like his previous work,
Ex Machina, this movie is thought-provoking
and arthouse-y. In fact, its producers thought
it was “too intellectual” and “too complicated” but Garland refused to dumb it
down to appeal to a wider audience. Hence,
this leads to the movie being released internationally through Netflix instead of having a wide theatrical release. After watching it, at
a business standpoint, I understand the concerns of the producers. It’s indeed the kind of movie that won’t have
massive appeal, and thus, won’t be profitable.
It can get so weird and metaphorical, to the point that it can turn off most viewers.
Basically, it’s about a bizarre
anomaly that has mysteriously popped out and engulfed a certain area in the
United States. Named “The Shimmer”, it
has been slowly growing for three years since it appeared but has been kept a
secret from the public. Inside it, topography,
physics, and biology – especially biology – are warped. And no one from the expeditions sent by the
government into it has ever come back, until a soldier named Kane (Oscar
Isaacs) does. However, he soon goes into coma
after reuniting with his wife, Lena (Natalie Portman). Determined to find answers, she – a
biologist and a former soldier – joins the next, all-women expedition – composed
of a psychologist (Jennifer Jason Leigh), a physicist (Tessa Thompson), a
paramedic (Gina Rodriguez), and a geologist (Tuva Novotny) – into “The Shimmer.”
There are things to
like about this movie at surface level.
The performances are stellar, and the visuals are striking. There’s suspense and intrigue in the
storytelling, especially because of all the uncanny and fascinating stuff that
the characters encounter inside “The Shimmer.”
Most notable of all are the wildlife, which includes shark-toothed
alligators, human-shaped plants, and the most disturbing bear mutant ever. However, once the film nears the end, it’s as
if it gets more muddled and pretentious, that it eventually reaches an
unsatisfying, pointless finish.
That was how I felt about Annihilation during the first viewing. I was
fascinated by “The Shimmer” and its elements, and I thought the narrative was
doing a great job in executing a “What the F is going on?” feel to it. But I thought the payoff didn’t match the intriguing build up. So the film’s initial impression
on me is that it was okay, but confusing and underwhelming overall.
I was actually already starting to write a
review for this film when I chanced upon interviews of Garland, Isaacs, and
Portman. And from them, I picked up some
insights which I thought would have made the film interesting if those were indeed
the cases. So I decided to watch the
film again.
At second viewing, armed with the
insights I picked up from those interviews, the movie becomes significantly
better. I didn’t get too blown away. But I learned that, based on the available
information in the plot, it does have mindblowing implications. Thus, I got to pick up and appreciate the subtleties happening on screen – with the editing, storytelling, landscapes, etc. – which, I realized, were brilliant. Furthermore, it has a variety of themes richly
playing out in the story – including cancer, marriage and adultery, and
evolution and survival – which basically all come down to self-destruction and
self-reflection.
In the end, Annihilation is a multi-layered film that can be looked at in
a variety of ways. But it isn’t for everyone. It’s not the kind of movie you would want to
watch to have an “easy good time.”
However, if you are in the condition to chore through it, it could prove
to be a very stimulating experience.
No comments:
Post a Comment