If Spider-Man: Homecoming is amazing and spectacular, then the sequel Spider-Man: Far From Home must be beyond
so, for it’s definitely a step up. It’s
a movie that only gets better and better as it progresses. I had quite a blast with it; there was no moment
in it that I didn’t like.
Showing posts with label Spider-Man. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Spider-Man. Show all posts
Sunday, July 07, 2019
Monday, December 17, 2018
'Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse' Is Amazing and Spectacular
The title of this review is the
same as the title that I gave my review for Spider-Man: Homecoming. It’s because Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse is
also worthy of being described with those two adjectives that have been forever
attached to the iconic comic book character.
In fact, Spider-Man: Into the
Spider-Verse is much better than Spider-Man:
Homecoming.
Sunday, March 11, 2018
The New 'Spider-Man' Animated Series Spins the Mythos with Mixed Results
The Spectacular Spider-Man was an awesome show. From 2008 to 2009, it ran for two seasons
before being abruptly cancelled, breaking the hearts of its viewers. For many, it’s the
pinnacle of Spider-Man cartoons. It’s smart, sentimental, and exciting; and despite
being primarily kid-oriented, it succeeded in being universally appealing to Spidey
fans of all ages. In my mind, the 90’s
animated series is slightly better, but it’s most likely due to nostalgia and
the fact that, among all Spidey cartoons, it was the closest to reflect the comic
books. However, as a show per se, The Spectacular Spider-Man has the
superior quality. It’s for that reason
that, since a season 3 is looking to be impossible, it’s my benchmark to
whatever new Spidey cartoon is out there.
I didn’t like and follow Ultimate Spider-Man because: a.) it was crafted
to exclusively entertain kids, and thus, it was too goofy and juvenile; and b.)
it was the show that was made in order to replace The Spectacular Spider-Man. However,
the subsequent Spidey cartoon caught my interest.
Tuesday, July 11, 2017
'Spider-Man: Homecoming' Is Amazing and Spectacular
There’s probably no other
fictional character that I got to care for more than Spider-Man. In fact, there was a time where I thought
that a great disservice was being done to the character that I was compelled to write at lengths about it. I’m deeply fond of Spider-Man. Not only do I
adore his terrific characterization and mythology, but I actually consider him as a role model; he genuinely inspires.
That’s why, I admit, I’m biased of my assessment here. I’ve always been when it
comes to Spider-Man media. Heck, I even consider Spider-Man 3, The Amazing Spider-Man, and The Amazing Spider-Man 2 as good movies, an opinion that many will disagree with. Nevertheless, I truly have had tremendous fun
with Spider-Man: Homecoming. So far, it’s the best movie I’ve seen this year. And I doubt that it will fall from
the top 5 in my year-end list for best 2017 movies – guaranteed top 3 even!
Spider-Man: Homecoming is not the best Spider-Man film ever made. That remains to be – and might likely forever be – Spider-Man 2. But it’s a pretty good one, and deserving to be described with the same adjectives that Spider-Man is most identified with: “amazing” and “spectacular.”
Spider-Man: Homecoming is not the best Spider-Man film ever made. That remains to be – and might likely forever be – Spider-Man 2. But it’s a pretty good one, and deserving to be described with the same adjectives that Spider-Man is most identified with: “amazing” and “spectacular.”
Tuesday, July 26, 2016
Tom Holland Should Date Brie Larson, and Team up with Tobey Maguire and Andrew Garfield (Or "What I Want to See After 'Spider-Man: Homecoming'")
The debut of Tom Holland’s Peter
Parker/Spider-Man in Captain America: Civil War blew me away. He hasn’t
even had his own movie yet, but with just a couple of scenes in Civil War, he has already impressed
enough for many to declare – including me – that he’s the best live-action
depiction of the character yet. And this
opinion is further being constantly enforced by every new detail being released
and announced about next year’s Spider-Man:
Homecoming.
As a huge Spidey fan, there are a
lot of things about the character’s mythos that I would love to have Marvel do
in future movies. However, I have two
fantasies – two unlikely and strange fantasies
– that I badly want to see happen the most.
Wednesday, April 29, 2015
What Can Christians Learn from Spider-Man
Jesus Christ is the ultimate
standard of every Christian. But through
our earthly heroes – whether real or fictional – we receive reflections of the
good and praiseworthy qualities that we can fully see in Jesus Christ. And, at the same time, the good and
praiseworthy qualities that we find in our heroes – real or fictional – are
traced back or projected towards our admiration of the supreme worth of Jesus
Christ.
As far as I can remember, Spider-Man has always been one of
my most favorite fictional characters ever. However, it’s not only because of the
coolness and uniqueness of the character that I get to love Spider-Man but,
most importantly, because of the admirable qualities that make him a genuine role
model despite of being a fictional character.
And Christians can learn some really deep lessons from Spider-Man.
WITH GREAT POWER COMES GREAT
RESPONSIBILITY
Let’s start with the most obvious
– Spidey’s iconic motto: “With great power comes great responsibility.” From what I’ve written about it before:
It simply means that responsibility always accompanies power, and the amount of responsibility is directly proportional to the amount of power; hence, the greater the power, the greater the responsibility. And what is this responsibility? To do the right thing, of course! If you found yourself possessing the capability or are in the position to do the right thing, then you should do it. Or as Martin Sheen (as Uncle Ben in 2012’s The Amazing Spider-Man) put it, “…if you could do good things for other people, you had a moral obligation to do those things. That's what at stake here. Not a choice, responsibility.”
Therefore, if Spidey is put in a
situation where he knows he can do something good, he jumps into it with no
hesitation. When facing a difficult
choice, but it’s apparent that it’s the right thing to do, he will still choose
it. He takes responsibility of the good
he could do with the power he found himself having.
In the same way, we Christians have
been given much “power” (2 Timothy 1:7, Acts 1:8, Philippians 4:13, Ephesians
3:20, Luke 10:19, etc.), hence, we should act on the “responsibility” that has
been entrusted to us (Matthew 28:19, Matthew 5:13-16, Luke 10:30-37, Hebrews
10:24, Titus 2:7-9, etc.). Nonetheless,
we should not think that we have to immediately go “save the world” (besides,
saving the world was Jesus’ job, not ours). Yes, Spider-Man has been instrumental or has contributed to saving the world a couple of times. But it’s only because of his consistent willingness to take responsibility and do his best in every chance he can do good that he developed the moral instinct and preparedness to do good in whatever scenario, regardless of being big or small in scale. Likewise, we should just do the best we can in doing good whenever the opportunity or situation calls for it – whether it be small or big (Luke 16: 10).
DO THE RIGHT THING. NO MATTER WHAT.
An integral facet established by
Spider-Man co-creator, Stan Lee, for the character to make him relatable is how
his alter ego, Peter Parker, is constantly struggling with personal troubles
such as financial difficulties and getting bullied (especially during his
earlier days). Moreover, his personal
life is even affected negatively because of prioritizing the good he does as
Spider-Man – he’s always late on appointments and school, benefits and
opportunities are sacrificed, and even his relationships with the important
people in his life suffer. It’s as if he
can’t catch a break. What’s even worse
is, due to the works of haters like J. Jonah Jameson, any good that he does is
unappreciated by the public as he’s branded as a “menace.” But regardless of the circumstance he’s in or
any consequences it might cost him personally, he makes no excuses and he will
do the right thing at every opportunity.
Facing difficulties is always
part of being a Christian. But even in
the midst of whatever degree or form of difficulties, just as Spider-Man constantly
brings justice to the being of his Spider-Man identity, we should likewise constantly
uphold our Christian identity. We, Christians,
are to obey Christ’s commandments and pursue God’s glory in all things. With the same consistency and selflessness
that Spider-Man displays in doing the right thing, so should we likewise display
in doing right in every situation.
No. Matter. What.
Doing the right thing is often
not easy. There will be times we will be
sacrificing a personal benefit or advantage.
And there will be times that a good deed will go unappreciated. And there will be even times when the right
thing to do is an unpopular one.
But we learn from Spider-Man that we ought to do the right thing, no
matter how hard it proves to be.
For us Christians, if it’s worth
doing for God’s glory, then we need to do it.
Even at the point of death (Revelations 2:10).
PRESS ON. NO MATTER WHAT.
Spider-Man displays inspiring
resiliency. Whatever antagonisms and difficulties
he faces as both Spider-Man and Peter Parker, he continues to fight on. He will do the best that he can in any
situation to do the right thing and to overcome the challenges in front of him.
But he does fall sometimes. He gets discouraged. There are times he wishes that he never became
Spider-Man. There are times that he wants
to quit – or even had quit. Despite the
spider-powers, he is human after all and subject to human failings. However, he never permanently stays down.
He eventually rises back to his feet.
Stronger than ever. He presses
onwards. He continues being
Spider-Man.
Resiliency – and, most
importantly, faithfulness – in all circumstances is necessary for a Christian. In discussing my life slogan, “Keep Calm and Press On”, I wrote, with regards to Philippians 3:7-14:
Despite the tremendous amount of hardships and struggles that he had undergone in his life, Paul remained enthusiastic, resolute, and kept moving forward. Why? For he understood the great value of this future prize that God has set for him in Heaven, and that no earthly pleasure or glory can ever come close in matching that. So he worked hard for the glory of God – storing riches in Heaven that will last for eternity – rather than seeking earthly pleasures and glory that are all temporary anyway. In everything, he gave it his all, no matter what. He knew that every sacrifice, every pain, every drop of effort, is going to be worth it; the glory and happiness that he would receive as reward far outweigh the sufferings that he experienced in this world while working for God’s glory.
While Spider-Man probably only
has a noble – but incomplete – sense of altruism that keeps him fighting,
Christians have the advantage of having an infinitely valuable Heavenly Prize to
look forward to – a Reward that will more than make up for all sacrifices done
in this world. Hence, don’t Christians
have more reason to fight for? Don’t
Christians have more reason to be resilient about? Don’t Christians have more reason to rise up
after falling? Don’t Christians have
more reason to press onwards? Don’t
Christians have more reason to continue upholding their Christian
identity?
BE JOYFUL. NO MATTER WHAT.
With the many problems that he experiences
in his life, and with his strong sense of duty of doing right no matter what,
it would come to no surprise if he ended up being a burdened and grave superhero. But, ironically, he is quite
the opposite. Spider-Man is one of the
most joyful superheroes around. Yes,
there are some times that he feels that being Spider-Man is a curse, but as
I’ve mentioned earlier, he eventually gets over his brooding. Most of the time, he enjoys being Spider-Man
and delights in what he does. And that
is reflected on his cheerful, goofy attitude when he goes around doing his
Spider-Man duties.
In the same way, despite the
hardships, there is much to rejoice about as a Christian (1 Peter 1:8,
Philippians 4:4, Luke 10:20, etc.). I no
longer need to go at length discussing how or in what ways. Yes, we have crosses to bear (Luke 9:23), and
pain and struggles will always be part of the Christian life, but there is much
joy in the presence of Christ. And it
should be apparent for the world to see as we live out our Christian identity
and do our Christian duties.
Friday, March 06, 2015
Chain of Thoughts: February's 'Spider-Man' Happenings
Last February was
a big Spider-Man month. First, the epic “Spider-Verse”
concluded. Second – and most importantly – Marvel
and Sony reached a deal to bring Spider-Man to the Marvel Cinematic Universe! Here are my musings…
Part 1: Spider-Verse
→ “Spider-Verse” wasn’t perfect. But it had a lot of good things going for it. I greatly enjoyed the premise and the story,
and I’m mostly satisfied with how everything unfolded. Seeing all of those Spider-Men (and –Women)
banding together was awesome. However, I
don’t believe that it made true to its promise to feature “every Spider-Man”
ever. But I have to give props to Dan
Slott and his people, for it was obvious that they truly tried. There were plenty of delightful surprise participants.
![]() |
| Example: Supaidāman and Leopardon! |
→ I also
appreciated a lot the inclusion of the cartoon-y, lighter versions of
Spider-Man – like Spider-Ham, the Spider-Man from the Hostess snack ads back in
the 70’s and 80’s, the Spider-Man from Spider-Man
and His Amazing Friends (there were many deaths among the ranks of
alternate Spider-Men but this one was what disturbed me most), the Spider-Man
from the campy 60’s animated series version, the lil' Spider-Man from Bullpen Bits/Mini Marvel (just a cameo though), the Spider-Man from the popular Capcom crossover arcade games, the
newspaper strip Spider-Man, and the Spider-Man from the Ultimate Spider-Man TV series.
→ Too bad that
Marvel’s Sony deal couldn’t have happened earlier (or the Spider-Verse story
couldn’t have happened later) for it prevented the use of the Spider-Man from
the awesome Spectacular Spider-Man TV series
(which, if I understand it right, is co-owned by Sony). The writers, however, used a clever approach in referencing the cinematic versions of Tobey Maguire and Andrew Garfield.
![]() |
| Along with a mention of the Spider-Man: Turn of the Dark version |
→ It seemed that
the Spider-Man from the awesome 90’s animated series was not included (if he was, I haven’t caught sight of
him). Even if I’ve always had the
skepticism in me of the truthfulness of the claim that all Spider-Men will make
an appearance, I was still surprised that that version was not given a part in
the story.
→ I acknowledge
that the featured “Spider” characters have been extensive already. But I was really expecting a Spider-Army of
Captain Britain Corps proportions, especially in the climactic battle. But the mass of the Spider-Army – which I
presume were the recruits of Miles Morales’ team (his was the only logical
contingent that could have brought all those Spidey cameos in the final battle)
– were mere “glimpses” during the chaos.
The ambiguity of the attendance and quantity of the different Spider-Men
in the final battle was likely to be Slott’s way of implying that “every Spider-Men ever” were participating in the climactic battle.
It’s kind of disappointing, really.
![]() |
| The best look of the assembled Spider-Army during the final battle was from Spider-Verse #2. |
→ My biggest
nitpick with “Spider-Verse”, however, is that my most favorite alternate
version of Spider-Man – Spider-Man Noir – was sidelined early in the game. Bummer.
→ At the end of “Spider-Verse”, what does Otto’s instruction to his Anna Marie AI mean? Did Otto Octavius prepare a contingency plan to reclaim Peter Parker’s body? Will it activate after a hundred days? Is SpOck or Dr. Octopus set to return? Will I be compelled to write a series of love-hate blog posts once again?
![]() |
| Uh-oh. |
→ I was hoping
that something awesomely creative was intended for Silk. But being “The Bride” is not enough at all. I still have the same issues on her as before. If she would have been a
Spider-Woman replacement for Jessica Drew, then that would have been a lot, lot
better for the character. At this point,
for me, she just seems to be a gratuitous additional Spider character that made
the crowd of present Spider-characters feel more crowded and contributes in the
diminishment of the uniqueness of Spider-Man. Silk, however, is popular enough to receive
her own ongoing series. Hopefully, my
opinion for the character might improve during this series’ development.
![]() |
| It was really funny that these two still commit PDI even in the midst of their Spider brethren. |
→ The
Spider-Woman Gwen Stacy introduced in “Spider-Verse” was also popular enough to
receive her own series. She’s indeed an
intriguing character that deserves more exposure so that her character and
universe can develop further. The only
bad thing about it? Spider-Gwen is a stupid, unimaginative title for the series.
→ Spider-Woman
rocked in “Spider-Verse”, and she has her costume updated afterwards. I’m kind of split regarding the change. I already got used to the original look, but
she definitely was in need of a costume upgrade. Best thing about it was the banter between
her and Carol Danvers as they make fun of each other’s past costume
choices.
![]() |
| Hahahaha. |
→ In the
aftermath of “Spider-Verse”, some of the Spider-Men, led by Spider-UK, decided
to continue teaming up, and their adventures are going to be the basis of the Secret Wars’ spin-off series, Spider-Verse, coming later this
year. That’s cool. I definitely want more team-ups of different
Spider-Men from different universes.
Part 2: Spider-Man Joins the MCU
→ I got wind of
the announcement that Marvel and Sony has agreed to let Spider-Man join the Marvel
Cinematic Universe while browsing my Facebook newsfeed on an afternoon, after a
tiring work-day. After reading the
headline, I went…
It was a surreal
moment for me. I’ve always wanted for Spidey to be in an Avengers film. (But, to be honest, I will give this up in a
heartbeat for a Spider-Verse movie instead.)
![]() |
| This scene is from the Avengers 2 trailer, and someone edited Spider-Man in. Cool. |
→ I’m very
excited for some news on how Spider-Man will be introduced to the MCU. But I hope that Spidey’s inclusion to
Marvel’s Phase 3 plans won’t sacrifice the development schedule and quality of
the originally planned Marvel movies.
→ When
announcement that it’s almost definite that the next film version of Spider-Man
won’t be white, my elation transformed to horrified distress. And it’s not a racist thing. It’s simply an ignorant, bigoted thing for
someone to accuse another of racism simply because he prefers Spider-Man to be
white. (Heck, I myself am not even white.) It’s just that Spider-Man is my most
favorite character that has originated from comics, and I just want
Spider-Man to be as accurate and genuine as possible when translated into the big
screen. It is imperative that that Spider-Man should be Peter Parker because the qualities that made me love the
character is essentially founded in him.
→ The
counter-argument is to point out that Peter Parker already had two different
cinematic depictions before. Well, that
may be true. But this is a different
thing. This is the first time Spider-Man
will be teaming up with other Marvel heroes in the big screen, and I badly want
it to be Peter Parker having this cinematic honor. Miles Morales has to wait.
→ Of course,
none of those qualities that made Peter Parker integral as Spider-Man is
because he is white. So am I good then
with a non-white Peter Parker? Still, a
no. Peter Parker/Spider-Man is such an important,
iconic character that accuracy on the race is still a significant part of his
individuality as much as what his sex is.
Making Peter Parker black or Hispanic makes me as uncomfortable and
upset as making him a girl instead (like “Petra Parker.” Ugh). In the same way, I will be extremely upset if
Sherlock Holmes is depicted as an American woman instead of a British male (heck,
I hate “Joan Watson” of Elementary,
even though I find the show entertaining).
Sex and race might not be the most important substances of what makes a
character special, but they are still a big part of how the character is
consciously defined. Changing the race
or sex when depicting a character – especially if it’s an iconic one like
Spider-Man – in another medium could take a lot out of the character.
→ So, please, please, Marvel. Let Peter Parker be the Spider-Man of the MCU. And white.
Tuesday, December 09, 2014
Sony Should Adapt 'Spider-Verse' to Revitalize Their 'Spider-Man' Franchise
![]() |
| Click to enlarge for this art’s full magnificence |
The future of Sony’s The Amazing Spider-Man franchise is
shaky and unclear after the unsatisfying performance of The Amazing Spider-Man 2 in both earnings and critical reception (for
the record, personally, I still liked it despite its flaws.
But it was likely because of my extreme loyalty to Spider-Man). It’s so “shaky and unclear” that rumors of
Sony’s next step for their Spidey franchise range from insanely stupid ones
like an “Aunt May” movie to insanely delightful ones like teaming up with
Marvel Studios to bring Spidey to the Marvel Cinematic Universe. At this point, Sony is still unsure of where
to go after ASM2.
Well, if anybody from Sony can
read this, I have this free, crazy suggestion for them to dramatically rejuvenate
the franchise as early as possible: let them adapt the “Spider-Verse”
storyline!
“Spider-Verse” is Dan Slott’s
ongoing Spider-Man mega-event wherein different Spider-Men (and “spider”
characters) from different universes band together to face the threat of Morlun
and his kin, who are hunting and consuming people across the multiverse that
belong to the “spider totem.” I am
currently enjoying it a lot so far, and I think that its premise could work well in making an epic Spidey movie.
Sony should proceed with ASM3.
Keep the continuity of the first two Amazing
Spider-Man movies, but abandon everything related to the “Sinister Six” or
Oscorp. Don’t mention anything about
Oscorp or the Sinister Six anymore. The movie will pick off Andrew Garfield’s
Spider-Man years after the last movie (the movie can start with a montage of short glimpses of his adventures during the gap between the movies). Later, Morlun is introduced to the
story. Peter Parker has no idea where
this new villain came from; let Morlun’s background be a mystery for a
while. The only thing that Peter knows
is that Morlun wants to feed on his spider life force. To get to Spider-Man, Morlun will threaten
Peter’s love ones. They fight. Spider-Man experiences the toughest,
deadliest fight of his career. He wins;
Morlun is seemingly vanquished. After
the denouement – in a post-credit scene – Spidey is swinging around New York,
when, suddenly another Spider-Man swings and called out to him. Astonished and startled, Garfield’s Spidey jumped
to engage the second Spidey in battle.
After a brief skirmish, the newcomer Spidey was able to calm Garfield’s
Spidey. The second Spidey removes his
mask, revealing the face of – dum-dum-dum – Tobey Maguire! “The war is just
starting,” Tobey Maguire’s Spider-Man says.
Roll credits. Two years later, The Amazing Spider-Man: Spider-Verse
happens.
Wouldn’t that be mindblowing?
Aside from getting the chance to see Andrew Garfield’s Spider-Man and Tobey Maguire’s Spider-Man together, here are other awesome implications of a Spider-Verse movie, where different Spider-Men from different universes will team up:
Aside from getting the chance to see Andrew Garfield’s Spider-Man and Tobey Maguire’s Spider-Man together, here are other awesome implications of a Spider-Verse movie, where different Spider-Men from different universes will team up:
- Andrew Garfield playing different Peter Parkers, a la Tatiana Maslany’s fantastic performance in Orphan Black. There is no need for a lot of them (a big roster will probably me too crowded, too messy). Three or four different Andrew Garfield-played Spider-Men is enough (as long as one of them is Spider-Man Noir).
- Miles Morales and Miguel O’Hara in the big screen! For me, “Spider-Verse” is the best approach of bringing these two alternate Spider-Men into the big screen. I don’t think that a stand-alone Ultimate Spider-Man or Spider-Man 2099 movie will work just as well.
- One of the players in “Spide-Verse” is “Spider-Gwen”, a Spider-Woman from an alternate universe where Gwen Stacy is the one bitten by the radioactive spider instead of Peter Parker. Emma Stone killed as Gwen Stacy, and her returning to play an alternate spider-powered version of the character is going to be exciting.
- A CGI Spider-Ham!!!
If Sony really want to replicate what Marvel Studios has accomplished so far with the MCU, Spider-Verse is probably their best opportunity to do so. They want an ensemble of superheroes like
Marvel Studios’ Avengers? Boom, a superhero team made up of different Spider-Men. They want a shared universe? Boom, they get a shared multiverse. They want an answer to Rocket Raccoon? Boom, Spider-Ham.
$$$!
Do it, Sony!
It’s ambitious, but if pulled off, “Spider-Verse” could turn out to be the most epic thing ever accomplished in the history of superhero movies.
Sunday, August 03, 2014
RE: ASM #4's Introduction of Silk
Unbeknownst to Peter Parker, the irradiated spider that gave him his
Spidey powers was able to bite another one after it had bitten him. This other recipient of spider powers was
some girl named Cindy Moon, who has been locked down by Ezekiel (an important Amazing Spider-Man character back when J.
Michael Straczynski was the writer for the book in the 2000’s) in a bunker all
these years to prevent Morlun (another
important character in Straczynski’s ASM
run) from going after them. Per the
“Original Sin” event (wherein the supposed secrets of the Marvel Universe has
been revealed in an attempt to introduce new characters and retcon old ones),
this fact has finally been made known to Spider-Man.
Afterwards, Spider-Man proceeded to bust her out of her bunker.
Hence, after getting glimpses of Cindy in the past issues, she has finally made
her full appearance in Amazing Spider-Man
#4.
And the first characteristic we learned about the character is she
can swear like a sailor.
We, through Spidey’s commentary, also get to evaluate her
powers. She’s faster than Spidey, but
apparently less strong. She also has a
more potent spider-sense.
I like how Spidey describes it as “Matrix/bullet-time good,” made
the whole initial-display-of-powers process interesting.
Aside from the spider-speed and spider-sense, she can wield organic
webs from her fingertips, which are more versatile than Spidey’s web formula. At one point, Silk got to catch Spider-Man by
making a web with a barbed tip, much to Spidey’s amazement. She even used it to construct herself an
impromptu costume.
Since the “Spider-Woman” and “Spider-Girl” names are both taken,
this new Spider-character’s name is “Silk.”
Frankly, “Silk” doesn’t work for me.
It sounds boring, dumb, unremarkable, and lacked impact. Also, I hope this improvised web costume of
hers isn’t a permanent look, which I find unexciting and dull.
As mentioned earlier, Ezekiel hid Cindy Moon to keep Morlun
away. For mere moments after Spidey freed
Cindy from her bunker…
So one of the purposes of this character’s creation is to put the epic “Spider-Verse” into motion, and she is, obviously, going to play an
important role in it.
And in the last page of ASM #4,
we understand Morlun’s “Spider-Bride” remark a little bit better.
Whoa. Silk is going to be
Spider-Man’s new love interest? This development
– their spider-senses giving them a special empathy for each other, compelling
them to be drawn to one another – is the most intriguing thing about Silk’s
addition to the Spider-Man mythos.
So, overall, my first impression of Silk is… well, I’m not yet
sure. I would have definitely welcomed
her warmly if there is no Spider-Woman character already, or that she was meant
to become the new Spider-Woman or Spider-Girl character. The “Spider-Bride” angle and the
“Matrix/bullet-time good” powers show some promise for this character. It is possible for something awesome to
happen out of all of this.
On the other hand, there are aspects I don’t like. Again, I would have been excited if she was
going to be a new Spider-Woman, but she isn’t.
At this point, to me, it feels like that this character’s conception has
been gratuitous. The Marvel Universe
(Earth-616) is getting crowded with Spider-types already, and this present Spider-characters
population kind of sips a little out of Spider-Man’s uniqueness as a
character. More so with Silk, since she
shares the same origin as Spidey’s. Furthermore,
it feels like Spider-Man’s characterization has been cheapened with Silk
receiving better spider powers from the same irradiated spider that bit
Peter.
I hope Dan Slott (current writer of ASM) would properly develop this character well and would have a
brilliant justification for her inclusion in the Marvel Universe or, at least,
in Spider-Man’s world. I think I will be
satisfied with, at least, significant character depth and smart plot purpose for
Silk. These would probably make me love
this new character eventually. But if
she was created merely for the sake of having something shocking to reveal for
“Original Sin” and as a catalyst to kick off “Spider-Verse,” then I would probably
dislike her instead. For now, it’s still too early to really tell.
Saturday, April 19, 2014
RE: Superior Spider-Man Part 7 (Or "Final Evaluation: 'Superior' Has Been Fun Overall but the En- OH, SWEET MOTHER OF ZEUS, SPIDER-VERSE IS HAPPENING!!!")
For your reference:
Part 1 - “Why Peter Parker Should Remain as Spider-Man” (December 2012)
Part 2 - “I Admit That 'Superior' Has Been Actually Pretty Cool So Far, but I Still Prefer the Return of 'Amazing'” (April 2013)
Part 3 - “Enjoying it, but I'm Madder Than Before!” (July 2013)
Part 4 - “New-Look Superior Spider-Man Upped the Ante!” (July 2013)
Part 5 - “Peter Parker's Death Anniversary” (December 2013)
Finally, it’s over. As promised, I will make one final evaluation
of Superior Spider-Man.
I actually don’t have much to
say. It was a passable finale. But that’s it: it was just passable. It merely sufficed, but it’s hardly a
glorious ending. It seemed dumb,
rushed, and underwhelming.
Look, I hated the SpOck concept
much because the sly ploys and lying from Dan Slott and Co. instilled in me the
idea that it was going to be a very long status quo; if so, this would dilute and
smear the awesome quintessence of Spider-Man.
But despite my apathy for it, I also enjoy and acknowledge its
originality, good entertainment value, and action-packed pace. In that sense, Superior Spider-Man is actually quite kickass. Heck, it was engaging enough to compel me to
write lengthily about it in six (five, if you don’t count the first one since
that was a piece prior Superior
Spider-Man’s actual run that argued it was a terrible idea) different
occasions prior to this one. With that
into consideration, I expected nothing less than a conclusion that is at least as
exciting and enjoyable as it has been from the start.
I was expecting the means of
Peter Parker’s return to be more creative and mindblowing. I was expecting the final confrontation with
Green Goblin to be more dramatic and grinding.
I was even expecting for Otto to go out in a blaze of glory. That in that final battle, the two of them
would work together – with Otto’s tactical efficiency and Peter’s heroic
instincts and resolute courage – in one body as Spider-Man against Green Goblin
and his minions. Then in the end, Otto
will provide some form of “preparing” for Peter for the life he had left
him.
![]() |
| Still, Otto's end had been a powerful, redemptive moment |
The beginning part of Superior Spider-Man was very intriguing
(mostly because of its novelty) and engaging, but the ending part was merely
satisfactory. So if I have to grade it, with the beginning
and ending parts as the spectrum – the former getting an A- and the latter getting
a B – then, my overall grade for Superior
Spider-Man is a B+.
With my anger for it gone (since
it ended with Peter back), I can say comfortably that the entire Superior Spider-Man run had been pretty
fun and a good addition to the Spider-Man mythos. It was a brilliant and original concept to
do. It kept me absorbed, that even
though I hated it, I was still immensely entertained by and drawn to it – the
“love-hate” feeling I had for SpOck has been a unique experience.
Now, onwards to the new era of
Spider-Man – can’t wait for Amazing
Spider-Man #1.
Some random musings:
• My favorite moment in the finale was this...
I missed the natural wisecracking of Peter a lot, hence, that was a very thrilling moment for me. Spidey’s effortless comeback, the Green Goblin’s immediate recognition of his identity due to the joke, and after not witnessing Spidey’s trademark smartassery for a long time, totally made me laugh out loud.
• The last issue had to rely on a degree of inconsistency and dumbness on many details to make the storyline and conclusion stick. It left a slight feeling of annoyance in me.
I missed the natural wisecracking of Peter a lot, hence, that was a very thrilling moment for me. Spidey’s effortless comeback, the Green Goblin’s immediate recognition of his identity due to the joke, and after not witnessing Spidey’s trademark smartassery for a long time, totally made me laugh out loud.
• The last issue had to rely on a degree of inconsistency and dumbness on many details to make the storyline and conclusion stick. It left a slight feeling of annoyance in me.
• So Otto decided to remove every
trace of his memory – hence, his entire consciousness – from the mind of Peter
Parker by the same process he did in eradicating Peter Parker’s consciousness
in Superior Spider-Man #9. So if the consciousness of Peter Parker
could come back from something like that, isn’t it reasonable to assume that
Otto’s consciousness can actually come back as well?
• Or is it a different matter
this time with Otto? In the case of
Peter, it seems that his consciousness could have anchored itself to the
memories of Peter Parker that Otto still retained post-Superior #9 (since those memories were already accessed by Otto
prior to the “Parker-ectomy” done on Superior Spider-Man #9). On the
other hand, in the case of Otto, every trace of his memories are erased from
Peter’s mind, so Otto’s consciousness has no memory to anchor itself to, as
Peter’s did. So could this have been
really permanent this time around?
• The mechanics of this mind swap
is kind of messy. In December 2012’s Amazing Spider-Man #700, it is clear
that Peter Parker’s consciousness died in Otto’s body but was able to transfer
all his memories to Otto who was in his body.
Then why was Peter Parker’s consciousness still living on by Superior Spider-Man #1? The only logical explanation I can think of
is that when Peter (dying in Otto’s body) uploaded his memories to Otto (who
was in Peter’s body), it was done in a “copy-paste” manner. Hence, there became two Peter Parker “files”
– the “original file” lay dying in Otto’s body, and the “copied file” was
integrated back to Peter Parker’s physical brain. Hence, the Peter Parker we have now is the
“copied file.” If you think of it that
way, the whole “mind swap” looked kind of stupid. But, hey, stupider things
have happened before to Spider-Man. Remember
in “The Other” arc wherein Peter Parker mutated into a giant spider-mom, and
then eventually gave birth to himself?
That was way stupider.
• The plot and resolution of Superior Spider-Man #31 are in some ways
parallel to the conclusion of “Spider-Island”: New York getting overrun by the
bad guys and good guys fighting them off; the use of an antidote; Spider-Man
teaming up with another Spider-Man; and mini-bots being instrumental in saving
the day.
• I love how Spidey employed mini
spider-bots. I’ve always pushed for their
utilization. I hope that mini
spider-bots will be a common element in Spidey’s repertoire.
• And I hope Peter decides to keep
a couple of Otto’s cool gadgetries. I
really loved SpOck’s cybernetic goggles and the retractable mechanical
spider-limbs on his back.
• Per Original Sin, Marvel’s next mega comicbook event:
In Spider-Man, readers will learn a second person was bitten by the radioactive spider which gave Peter Parker his powers.
At first, I thought it was going
to be connected to the ending of 2012’s Spider-Men
and that this second person bitten will turn out to be the Miles Morales of
Earth-616. But the teaser art for Amazing Spider-Man #1 shows otherwise,
for the second person bitten was a female.
Also, if I remember it correctly,
during an interview regarding the Amazing
relaunch, Slott mentioned of this, and hinted that this second person bitten
had chosen a life of villainy. Earth-616
Miles Morales turning out to be a villain would have been an interesting
development.
• I think it’s safe to claim that
2014 is a big Spidey year. There’s the
upcoming movie. There’s the end of Superior Spider-Man and the Amazing Spider-Man relaunch. The Amazing
Spider-Man: Family Business graphic novel has been pretty awesome – a page-turner
of a thrilling plot and of gorgeous art.
Then we’ll have a reunion of “The Amazing Spider-Man and His Amazing
Friends” trio in Amazing X-Men #7 (I would love a regular series to
happen). But the best of all is the
upcoming major Spidey storyline that will start in November…
The concept of different Spider-Men
from different realities teaming up is nothing new. This was done already in the last arc of the Amazing Spider-Man animated TV series
and in the Spider-Man: Shattered
Dimensions videogame. But “Spider-Verse”
is obviously going to be a thousand times more epic than those things, for Slott
and Marvel promise that “EVERY SPIDER-MAN EVER” will be featured in this event!
Every version of Spider-Man.
Every Spider-Man of every
universe.
EVERY. SPIDER-MAN. EVER.
Let that sink in.
I don’t know if “Spider-Verse”
can indeed deliver what is promised.
There are probably several thousands of Spider-Men featured in comicbook
medium alone. And Slott implied that
those from other media – like the Spidey from the Ultimate Spider-Man animated series – will be part of it as
well. Moreover, there will also be new Spider-Men making their debuts in “Spider-Verse.”
Wow. That’s a lot of Spider-Men. It will take some epic, innovative narrative
for this to work. Of course, the
possibility of “Spider-Verse” turning out a dud is there. A storyline premise with this magnitude will
always have the risk of being a disappointment present. But at this point, regardless of how it will
ultimately turn out, the mere fact that an epic concept like “Spider-Verse” is
happening could be considered a triumph already; it’s enough to bring my
excitement counter to OVER 9000!!!
Saturday, February 01, 2014
RE: Superior Spider-Man Part 6 (Or "Peter Parker is Indeed Coming Back!")
It would have been a hundred
times more awesome if the announcement of Peter Parker’s return broke out after
Superior Spider-Man #25. Why?
For this happened…
Nobody was expecting that. Everyone would have their mind blown by that
twist – which was no longer a real twist since everyone knew Peter Parker was
set to return prior to reading that issue. It would have been as electrifying as the last page of the first issue of Superior Spider-Man. That was a missed
opportunity.
Anyway, it’s really happening! Superior Spider-Man is ending; Peter
Parker will finally get his body and life back from Otto Octavius.
When the reports of Peter
Parker’s return first leaked, I was thrilled but suspiciously prudent. But now it has finally been made official, I can
relax and just be thrilled about it. I
can’t wait for April!
Here are some key quotes from Dan
Slott (writer and mastermind of Superior)
during some recent interviews on him when Peter Parker’s return was already
established as eminent – plus, my reactions:
“The fan reaction has been brilliant. It's been so polarized and, most of all, passionate. That's great. If Peter Parker, Spider-Man and Doc Ock make you feel this passionate, even if it's pulling your hair out? That's a wonderful thing. It means you care.”
That is so true. I can’t believe how the whole thing provoked
me into writing a lot about it. I never
wrote about a particular topic as extensively as I’ve done on Superior Spider-Man. And here I am again, writing my thoughts
on Superior Spider-Man. Heck, this is the sixth part already. And I will probably do a seventh (and,
hopefully, final) one on April to wrap things up.
“One of the great things we got out of Superior is that something happens in every issue. When you look at it, almost every issue or arc had some massive status-quo change for Spider-Man and his world. ‘You just destroyed Horizon Lab? Spider-Man just took over the Raft? What?’ Everywhere you looked around, something happened. Working on the series, we knew from day one that we were jamming our foot on the accelerator and we weren't lifting up. We're firmly on the gas, just going as fast as possible. That's the feel we wanted for this book. It was fun to see readers going, ‘Why is something big happening all of the time?’ That was part of the energy of this book.”
It was indeed mindblowingly
fast-paced, I will acknowledge that. It was one of the positive things about the book. The exhilarating-car-ride metaphor
works. Good one.
- “He’s Peter Benjamin Parker – the only one, true, amazing Spider-Man. He’s been a cultural icon for over half a century; did you really think he’d be gone forever? I remember back when I heard about the Human Torch dying in Jonathan Hickman’s Fantastic Four series, and I had plans to write some Spider-Man stories where Johnny Storm would’ve shown up. They changed because of Johnny’s absence, and the scripts I was turning in had Spidey acting the way I felt: ‘Oh yeah, Johnny Storm is dead? Hey Reed! Did you see a body? He’s gotta be coming back.’ I had Spidey in complete disbelief that Johnny was truly dead, but Tom Brevoort said I couldn’t do it that way. ‘What do you mean?’ I asked him, and he explained that I had to be true to Johnathan Hickman’s plans; I had to play as if Peter believed he was dead, to be fair to the other guy’s story.
“That’s very much how this worked as well. This has been in the works since Amazing Spider-Man #700 – the death of Peter in the Dying Wish storyline, the new Superior Spider-Man, all that. I’m kind of new at this secrecy thing, so I practiced the best poker face I could muster. At conventions and signings and public events when people asked if he was truly dead, I had to say ‘yes.’ I had to bellow it while twirling a mustache and acting sinister. [laughs] I had to own it for a good solid year; it’s akin to what they call in wrestling a ‘heel turn.’ As a writer I had to be evil and flat out lie to you. Of course, it was a lie.”
- “To do that for a solid year of my life, that’s the hardest thing I’ve had to do — to look small children in the eye at a convention and lie to them. One of them with an honest-to-God Little League uniform and a quivering lip. Inside, part of me was dying.”
- “It happened at a signing in New Jersey. During the course of that day I hit that scenario about three times. And I had to do it with a straight face. There was one sad little moppet in a little league uniform with a quivering lip who asked if Peter was dead, and I told him ‘sometimes bad things happen to good people. Sometimes the hero doesn’t always win. I’m sorry.’ I went home feeling terrible, but I had to stick to my guns.”
Well played, Mr. Slott. Well played.
That totally makes sense. Everyone who reads comic books knows that
death is never permanent in comics. Every character comes back from the dead,
one way or another, when convenient to a current tale. Hence, there’s the general lack of concern on
comic book deaths. So to remove this
sense of smug security on the inevitability of resurrection among fandom, Slott
and his co-conspirators had to maintain “kayfabe” as if SpOck (Spider-Ock) was
already permanent, or, at least, a long-term status quo. They had to sell it well to make the whole story
experience emphatic to fans. I admit
that that worked brilliantly. Indeed,
with all that gimmick, everyone is more euphoric by Peter Parker’s upcoming return.
Another important effect in the
end is that, as Axel Alonso (current Marvel Editor-in-Chief) pointed out in one
interview, people who have been taking Peter Parker for granted (after five
decades of stories that featured Parker battling a recurring set of villains
and personal problems) will appreciate him a little more.
- “But there’s a twist. There’s always a twist.”
- “On top of that, Peter will have to deal with something else [when he returns]. You always have to throw the left hook. It can't just be what everyone expects it's going to be, or where there's the fun in that? There's always one more thing on top, one more twist, one more bump in the road you did not see coming.”
Uh-oh. I don’t like the sound of that. But this development is to be expected.
Overall, I think I’ve had some
new found respect for Dan Slott. I’ve
not yet fully forgiven him – for epic SpOck might turn out to be, it was still a blasphemous thing to do to Spider-Man – but it’s going there. It depends on how Slott will handle Peter’s
return, if all of these will be worth it.
But he had already proved how clever he is. He clearly knows what he’s doing. And he knows how to play work on the readers.
As of this point, there are a
couple of questions we can’t wait to have answers for. The most important is, of course, how Peter
Parker will take back his body. But there
are a couple of other intriguing questions: What will happen to Otto Octavius? Will he end up dead, or will he remain in
Peter’s sub-consciousness?
And what is Slott’s main
purpose in marooning Miguel O’Hara – the Spider-Man of 2099 – in the
present? Will he be the catalyst to
Peter’s return? Will he become Otto
Octavius’ new vessel? At this point, I
know Slott always has something under his sleeve. I don’t think Miguel O’Hara was utilized in
the story just because. There’s a deeper
reason.
Will Peter Parker make amends with
the Avengers? SpOck leaving both Avengers
teams he belonged in doesn’t sit well with me.
I hope Spider-Man will be accepted back once Peter returns and explains
everything. One of the most delightful and
funniest moments in comics is Spider-Man’s interactions with his Avengers
teammates, and it will be a terrible downer if Spider-Man will no longer be part
of the Avengers.
What will Peter Parker’s reaction be when he learns that Otto had made him a doctor but had made him hook up with a little person? Without Otto’s efficiency and organizational skills, how will Peter Parker serve as CEO of his own company? Will he finally get to reunite with Mary Jane?
What will Peter Parker’s reaction be when he learns that Otto had made him a doctor but had made him hook up with a little person? Without Otto’s efficiency and organizational skills, how will Peter Parker serve as CEO of his own company? Will he finally get to reunite with Mary Jane?
Will Peter keep some of SpOck’s
hardware? I sure hope so! He should keep the cybernetic goggles and the
spider-bots (but make them smaller and less conspicuous, the same size of a
common spider). But the SpOck gadget I
really like for Parker to keep is the retractable mechanical spider-limbs. That gadget is pretty sensible and awesome! He might also want to keep maintaining a secret
lab or “hide-out” (maybe within Parker Industries’ premises), with the Living
Brain still on hand.
![]() |
| Now, that’s what Spider-Man is all about. That’s why Peter Parker is the one and only Spider-Man! |
Thursday, January 30, 2014
"With Great Power Comes Great Responsibility": Spider-Man's Most Inspiring Lesson
You can get tons of inspirational lessons from Spider-Man. But every lesson you can learn from Spider-Man can be ultimately traced originating from one basic principle, Spider-Man’s trademark mantra: “With great power comes great responsibility.” It simply means that responsibility always accompanies power, and the amount of responsibility is directly proportional to the amount of power; hence, the greater the power, the greater the responsibility. And what is this responsibility? To do the right thing, of course! If you found yourself possessing the capability or are in the position to do the right thing, then you should do it. Or as Martin Sheen (as Uncle Ben in 2012’s The Amazing Spider-Man) put it, “…if you could do good things for other people, you had a moral obligation to do those things. That's what at stake here. Not a choice, responsibility.”
You should always do what is
right – it’s a responsibility! That is some heavy stuff. That’s what “with great power comes great
responsibility” is all about. And a fifteen-year
old Spider-Man had to learn it the hard way.
But because of that fateful
event, it made Spider-Man one of the most morally steadfast superhero ever. Doing good is paramount to him. No matter what the cost will be, he will
pursue the right thing. Indeed, Spidey
sometimes find himself confused in determining or defining the “right thing to do.” But his sincerity of doing the
right thing can never be doubted.
![]() |
| As long as it’s the right thing to do, Spidey will stubbornly press on. |
Nothing will prevent him from doing what is right. Even if bad stuff and misfortune consistently happen to his life (due to the notorious “Parker luck”); even if his heroics and selfless deeds go unappreciated and unrewarded; even if, in return of saving and protecting the populace, he instead receives ungratefulness and prejudice from them; even if his personal life and relationships suffer whenever he prioritizes his moral responsibilities; even when he’s already exhausted and injured; even if he is facing tremendous hazards, and defeat or death is likely; even if the odds are greatly stacked up against him; and even if doing the right thing is unpopular to the majority, Spider-Man will always be resolute, courageous, positive, and jolly in doing good.
![]() |
| Of course, he snaps sometimes -- gets discouraged, impatient, and bitter. He’s human after all. But he always reverts back to his usual cool. |
He puts doing the right thing above anything else. Even above his self-interests and personal happiness. In Spider-Man 2 (one of the greatest movies ever), Peter Parker spoke of this (originally from his Aunt May): “Sometimes, to do what's right, we have to be steady and give up the thing we want the most. Even our dreams.” It’s very moving. This added another stirring layer to Spider-Man’s already inspiring character.
“With great power comes great
responsibility.” To fight for the right thing always. This is what really puts
the amazing on the Amazing Spider-Man.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)








%2B(Digital)%2B(Darkness-Empire)%2B041.jpg)


























